Tags401(k) 401(k) plan 401(k) plans ACA ACA Supreme Court Affordable Care Act affordable care act supreme court bans on discretion commerce clause concurrence Conkright contract inter Discretionary authority dissent ERISA federalism health care health care reform health insurance individual mandate Medicare Morrison Obama care patient protection and affordable care act pension plan amendments plan changes preemption presumption against vesting Price Price v. Board of Trustees private mandate Pundit blogs retirement retirement plan Ross sitting by designation state insurance regulations supreme court tax power vesting vesting disability benefits
Site DisclaimerERISA Pundit™ is a forum for the free exchange of information for educational purposes only for lawyers interested in ERISA and insurance law. Nothing posted on this website is legal advice nor should it be interpreted as legal advice in any circumstance. All posts reflect the personal views of the person posting only. By using this blog, you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the person posting, the site publisher, Smith, von Schleicher + Associates, or the ERISA Pundit himself. This blog and website should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
Monthly Archives: June 2012
The Pundit is concerned that the federal government’s taxing power can be exerted as a coercive mechanism to enforce the government’s view of social welfare. At least the Supreme Court preserved our freedom to refuse to purchase broccoli health insurance. … (Read More)
Posted at 2:46 PM Permalink